|
|
 |
|
|
|
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
LINDA SCHADE, ANDREW HARRIS, JUDITH BURNS, MARK ELRICH, KWAME ABAYOMI, TERRENCE FITZGERALD, SHARON BEARD, and PAUL SUH
Plaintiffs,
vs.
MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS,
LINDA H. LAMONE (in her capacity as Supervisor of Maryland’s State Board of Elections),
Defendants.
This case is brought on behalf of registered Maryland voters and candidates for public office to ensure the integrity of the November 2004 elections, and to preserve public trust and confidence in the system by which Maryland voters will elect the next President of the United States. Specifically, Plaintiffs bring this action against the Maryland State Board of Elections and its Administrator, Linda H. Lamone, for improperly certifying the Diebold AccuVote-TS electronic voting machines used in Maryland, and then failing to either correct or decertify the machines -- as required by state and federal law -- once it became clear that the machines could neither preserve the security and reliability of the November 2004 election nor create a voter verified paper audit trail. This suit is filed now, well in advance of the November 2004 election, to make sure that Maryland, which lies at the epicenter of the nationwide electronic voting machine controversy, does not become the next Florida.
Dowload the full text of the amended complaint. (PDF 556K)
Full text of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (PDF 135K)
Full text of the Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (PDF 343K)
Full text of the SBE's Motion to Dismiss (PDF 39K) that states that the SBE is above the law.
Full text of the SBE's Memorandum in Support of the Motion to Dismiss. (PDF 147K)
Contract documents between the Maryland State Board of Elections and Diebold
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Take Action Today to Make Sure Your Vote Counts!
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Breaking News
• Sept. 23, 2004 'A Massive Experiment' in Voting in The Washington Post
• Sept. 20, 2004 The Magic Voting Touch, an Editorial in The Washington Post
• Aug. 27, 2004 After Your Vote Vanishes, an Editorial in The Washington Post
• Aug. 26, 2004 Voting machine safeguards in question in The Baltimore Sun
• Aug. 25, 2004 Md. Machines Seek Vote of Confidence in The Washington Post
• How
They Could Steal The Election This Time: The Nation Magazine's exhaustive
examination of the potential problems with DRE voting systems, including Diebold in Maryland
• The Washington Post on TrueVote MD!
• Blackwell Halts Deployment of Diebold Voting Machines for 2004
• Gov. Ehrlich appoints new member
to election board
• E-voting regulators often join other
side when leaving office
• Women Voters Drop Paperless Vote Support
• The Disability Lobby and Voting
New York Times editorial
•Scans of the Hack the
Vote article
from the April issue of Vanity Fair magazine.
•Think You Voted in Maryland? Think Again
• Takoma Park
supports legislation to require modifications to new voting machines
purchased by the State of Maryland to create a verifiable paper trail
• Diebold "basically
had no interest in putting actual security in this system," said
Paul Franceus, one of the consultants. "It's not like they did
it wrong. It's like they didn't bother."
• MD Senate report finds security
risks, recommends paper
• Diebold gives paper
trail for FREE to San Diego County!!
More news.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|